Blog

42 013 Comments

• 

  RobertDes 12 juillet 2024 at 16 h 31 min

  https://psy-medcentr.ru
• 

  Robertoaxoky 12 juillet 2024 at 16 h 14 min

  https://romashkaclinic.ru
• 

  Maria Nutter 12 juillet 2024 at 15 h 30 min

  Hi would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most.Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a reasonable price?Thanks, I appreciate it!My blog :: spam
• 

  Robertgew 12 juillet 2024 at 15 h 10 min

  Hello everyone!!
  MCW Casino stands out for its quality and reliability. With great bonuses for new players, competitive betting odds, and rapid withdrawals, it’s a top choice. The reliable working mirror ensures uninterrupted play. I recommend giving it a try!
  MCW Casino is a trustworthy platform for betting and casino. The bonuses are impressive, withdrawals are speedy, and the Android app is convenient. With the reliable working mirror always accessible, I enjoy playing and recommend it to everyone!
  Catch the site where everything is in the best shape! – MCW Casino
  promo codes MCW Casino
  Mega Casino World partner entry
  how long does it take to withdraw money from Mega Casino World
  official website MCW Casino mirror for today
  MCW Casino apk download

  Good profits!
• 

  KennethBax 12 juillet 2024 at 14 h 10 min

  Greetings to the romantics and casino lovers!!
  Make every bet count with Baji999! Enjoy thrilling casino games and sports betting with lucrative bonuses. Join Baji999 and start your success story today!
  Make every game a win with Baji999! From slots to live dealer games, experience the thrill of success. Join Baji999 now, claim your bonus, and start your winning streak. Play and succeed!
  Catch the site where everything is in the best shape! – Baji999
  Baji999 Casino slot machines for money download for free
  Baji999 Casino play mirror slots download
  Baji999 Casino affiliate program
  Baji999 Casino download to phone
  download Baji999 Casino app on Android for free

  Good profits!
• 

  medication 12 juillet 2024 at 13 h 38 min

  strattera 25 mg cost
• 

  Williamspunk 12 juillet 2024 at 13 h 01 min

  https://nsdentalsolution.com
• 

  MichaelInwab 12 juillet 2024 at 12 h 04 min

  外送茶是什麼？禁忌、價格、茶妹等級、術語等..老司機告訴你！

  外送茶是什麼？
  外送茶、外約、叫小姐是一樣的東西。簡單來說就是在通訊軟體與茶莊聯絡，選好自己喜歡的妹子後，茶莊會像送飲料這樣把妹子派送到您指定的汽車旅館、酒店、飯店等交易地點。您只需要在您指定的地點等待，妹妹到達後，就可以開心的開始一場美麗的約會。

  外送茶種類

  學生兼職的稱為清新書香茶
  日本女孩稱為清涼綠茶
  俄羅斯女孩被稱為金酥麻茶
  韓國女孩稱為超細滑人參茶

  外送茶價格

  外送茶的客戶相當廣泛，包括中小企業主、自營商、醫生和各行業的精英，像是工程師等等。在台北和新北地區，他們的消費指數大約在 7000 到 10000 元之間，而在中南部則通常在 4000 到 8000 元之間。

  對於一般上班族和藍領階層的客人來說，建議可以考慮稍微低消一點，比如在北部約 6000 元左右，中南部約 4000 元左右。這個價位的茶妹大多是新手兼職，但有潛力。

  不同地區的客人可以根據自己的經濟能力和喜好選擇適合自己的價位範圍，以免感到不滿意。物價上漲是一個普遍現象，受到地區和經濟情況等因素的影響，茶莊的成本也在上升，因此價格調整是合理的。

  外送茶外約流程

  加入LINE：加入外送茶官方LINE，客服隨時為你服務。茶莊一般在中午 12 點到凌晨 3 點營業。
  告知所在地區：聯絡客服後，告訴他們約會地點，他們會幫你快速找到附近的茶妹。
  溝通閒聊：有任何約妹問題或需要查看妹妹資訊，都能得到詳盡的幫助。
  提供預算：告訴客服你的預算，他們會找到最適合你的茶妹。
  提早預約：提早預約比較好配合你的空檔時間，也不用怕到時候約不到你想要的茶妹。

  外送茶術語

  喝茶術語就像是進入茶道的第一步，就像是蓋房子打地基一樣。在這裡，我們將這些外送茶入門術語分類，讓大家能夠清楚地理解，讓喝茶變得更加容易上手。

  魚：指的自行接客的小姐，不屬於任何茶莊。
  茶：就是指「小姐」的意思，由茶莊安排接客。
  定點茶：指由茶莊提供地點，客人再前往指定地點與小姐交易。
  外送茶：指的是到小姐到客人指定地點接客。
  個工：指的是有專屬工作室自己接客的小姐。
  GTO：指雞頭也就是飯店大姊三七茶莊的意思。
  摳客妹：只負責找客人請茶莊或代調找美眉。
  內機：盤商應召站提供茶園的人。
  經紀人：幫內機找美眉的人。
  馬伕：外送茶司機又稱教練。
  代調：收取固定代調費用的人（只針對同業）。
  阿六茶：中國籍女子，賣春的大陸妹。
  熱茶、熟茶：年齡比較大、年長、熟女級賣春者（或稱阿姨）。
  燙口 / 高溫茶：賣春者年齡過高。
  台茶：從事此職業的台灣小姐。
  本妹：從事此職業的日本籍小姐。
  金絲貓：西方國家的小姐（歐美的、金髮碧眼的那種）。
  青茶、青魚：20 歲以下的賣春者。
  乳牛：胸部很大的小姐（D 罩杯以上）。
  龍、小叮噹、小叮鈴：體型比較肥、胖、臃腫、大隻的小姐。
• 

  AllanVom 12 juillet 2024 at 11 h 04 min

  pinup bet – пин ап официальный сат, pin up
• 

  Derrickced 12 juillet 2024 at 10 h 36 min

  Roman Vasilenko and the “Best Way” Cooperative: Not Guilty?

  The criminal prosecution of Roman Vasilenko, the founder of the “Best Way” cooperative, might be discontinued. This was reported by several sources, including deputies. According to available information, the authorities have reassessed the situation surrounding the “Best Way” cooperative and concluded that the prosecution was largely driven by the Central Bank’s departmental position, which initiated the attack on the cooperative in the fall of 2021. This position aligns with the interests of banks but not with the interests of citizens, especially under the conditions requiring special social support measures.

  Conflict History

  The investigation against the cooperative and Vasilenko, who had by then already stepped down as chairman, began when the Central Bank included “Best Way” in its list of companies with identified signs of illegal activity in the financial market (a warning list) as a potential financial pyramid in the fall of 2021.

  1. **Based on “signals” from certain media and unspecified “citizen complaints”**: These signals and complaints were not verified, and no audit of the cooperative was conducted despite regular audit reports issued by audit firms commissioned by the cooperative’s board.

  2. **Due to “mass advertising” by the cooperative**: However, the cooperative did not engage in direct advertising. It informed its shareholders and interested parties through social media and responded to media inquiries about its interest-free home purchase system.

  3. **Because of “uncertainty in the cooperative’s activities” and “lack of signs of economic activity”**: Although the cooperative’s activities were clearly defined in all versions of its charter (adjusted per Central Bank specialists’ comments, despite the cooperative not being under their supervision), it had acquired over 2500 apartments for its shareholders from 2014 to early 2022, when its property acquisition activities were halted by the investigation.

  The Central Bank’s information was forwarded to law enforcement agencies. The General Prosecutor’s Office blocked the cooperative’s website along with its payment system, and an earlier complaint had been filed by the Central Bank’s Northwest division.

  How the Cooperative Worked

  The “Best Way” cooperative’s system was simple and attractive: a shareholder made an initial contribution of 35-50% of the desired apartment’s cost. They could also save for this contribution in the cooperative’s account, participating in a savings program. After making the initial contribution, the shareholder waited in line for a year to a year and a half, then selected a property, which, upon approval by the cooperative’s lawyers and appraisers, was purchased with cooperative funds provided in a 10-year installment plan. The shareholder then repaid the cooperative for the property.

  The cooperative provided interest-free funds, but the shareholder paid a relatively small entrance fee, membership dues, property taxes, and utility payments. In some regions, such as Bashkortostan, cooperatives received tax benefits, but in most regions, shareholders paid taxes as legal entities since the cooperative owned the property.

  After repaying the cooperative’s funds, the shareholder registered the property in their name. Many repaid early, and hundreds had already registered their properties despite the 10-year term. Shareholders could also withdraw at any time and receive their contributions back.

  Despite additional payments and waiting periods, purchasing an apartment through “Best Way” was significantly cheaper and more attractive than taking a mortgage, even a preferential one. This was especially crucial for socially vulnerable groups who could not obtain a mortgage, such as pensioners and students. A significant percentage of the cooperative’s shareholders were former and active military personnel; the cooperative was founded by reserve military officer Roman Vasilenko and is currently led by State Duma deputy Sergey Kryuchek. Thousands of shareholders and their family members are defending the country.

  Sberbank: From Friend to Foe

  Sberbank was a long-time partner of the cooperative, managing its shareholder funds. By 2021, the cooperative operated in almost all Russian regions, with 20,000 members.

  The cooperative became a real competitor to bank mortgage programs.

  The struggle over the arrest and release of accounts mostly favored the investigating group from the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Prosecutor’s Office of St. Petersburg. However, the cooperative’s lawyers won some court cases. Sberbank blocked fund transfers even when court orders lifted the arrests, citing internal compliance rules. Other banks also withheld the cooperative’s development funds, which amounted to nearly 4 billion rubles, while banks managed the income from these funds.

  Case Details

  The cooperative was assigned the status of a civil defendant in the criminal case, facing claims of 16 billion rubles, though the total damage cited in the indictment was 282 million rubles. Most recognized victims filed claims against the foreign investment company “Hermes,” not the cooperative. There were no lawsuits against the cooperative in the criminal case.

  Claims against the cooperative involved demands for refunds of entrance and membership fees, contrary to their contracts. For instance, Dolyan, recognized as a victim, claimed these fees upon a recommendation from an investigator, concerning a contract closed in 2019 that had previously raised no issues and was not contested in civil court.

  Essentially, claims against “Hermes” are being shifted to “Best Way,” although a cooperative, by its legal nature, cannot be part of a holding. Sources say the theory of a holding is based solely on the promotional system under “Life-is-Good,” which dealt with both cooperative and “Hermes” products as alternatives. The investigation’s logic is that “Hermes” is abroad, but the cooperative is in Russia, and “Hermes” has reportedly restored its payment system. Nonetheless, the obligations of 282 million rubles cannot justify blocking the cooperative’s activities; even paying this sum would not affect its liquidity.

  Given the current social support situation in Russia, authorities may reconsider their stance on cooperatives. Compromise solutions include legislative initiatives to update and clarify the old consumer cooperation law.

  Deputies have suggested that a socially-oriented institution, which wouldn’t require state funding while effectively addressing housing issues, would benefit the economy and society. “Best Way” could serve as a model for such an institution, potentially protecting it from further attacks.